Re: RE: [RLdev] What is a webring?As I consider that possibility, I find it unacceptable. Finding it unacceptable I must ask why I find it so. If the ring manager created a wazillion 50 member webrings as a way to promote the ring-manager site, that would be ok. So what is different about a wazillion one-member "webrings"? I conclude, for me, that one-member "webrings" should not be listed in the directory. Well, when you create a Ringlink webring, the next page that comes up suggests that you list your ring in the directory, and this is even before the ring has any sites. All webrings start off with just 1 website, so instead of a limit on the number of sites, there should be a limit on how long that ring can be listed if it has only 1 website. Say 3 months? As to WebRing.com and RingSurf.com, these are the webring systems of the wazzillion 1 member webrings!! As we know unlike the system managers for these systems, Ringlink System managers take a far greater interest in what rings are allowed to join, and would never tolerate spam webrings, which unfortunatly have been giving the ring concept a very bad reputation! :-( James, as I recall, I joined one of your 1 member WebRing webrings, and I am still waiting to be approved! ;-) Interesting that the WebRing directory lists your 1 member webring! :^) Pete
|